Monday, October 1, 2007

Interactive Incentives - Rewarding Work and Learning


Recently I got to chat to Tom Harte of imcreative.co.uk. Tom is an Interactive Incentive and Performance Management solutions provider.

A what?

Tom designs interactive games that enable employers to drive productivity in a creative and competitive way. These games enable workers to compete against each other at work.

Tom demo'd some of his solutions for me. By rewarding productivity with real-life rewards - anything from extra holidays to cash bonuses - his games increase motivation levels. Workers can view their performance on their PC, or on a big screen on the operational floor. They can even compete individually or as a team against co-workers across the globe. And it turns out that harnessing the basic human urge to win is very good news for productivity and profits.

From the instant Tom showed me his solutions, I knew they work. Because one summer I worked in a shirt factory. We did a 10 hour day with one half hour break for dinner. I was at the end of the factory line - ironing shirts before they were packaged for delivery. I had to iron a minimum of 80 shirts an hour to earn my basic wage.

Everyone had their minimum number of pockets to sew, sleeves to cut out, or collars to fit. And all we did all day long was mentally compute whether or not we'd done enough work to make a bonus. And if we had made our bonus, how much it was. And whether we'd earned more than the person sitting nearest you.

If only Tom's games had been around then! Providing workers with incentives makes them perform better. And providing learners with incentives makes them learn better.

It's long been known that a Hogwart's style 'house' system helps children in schools achieve more. In a house system, pupils belong to one of a number of houses, and these houses compete over the year to win points.

But we only have Performance League tables, pored over retrospectively by anxious parents and governors. These tables report on how pupils have performed - they don't actually help the pupils perform.

So is it about time that our Government perhaps invests in an Interactive Incentive solution for our schools? Perhaps a nationwide performance board that reflects who's doing what well, when and where?

Imagine a system where the houses in each school compete internally for points, then the highest performing house goes on to compete locally, then nationally. Couldn't this really motivate all types of learning performance - from sport and academia through to social action?

Incentives like education-related trips or scholarships could be awarded. Top houses could be profiled. And instead of an empty facebook-style chattering space, we could have an educational space that rewards, connects and motivates learners.

Labels: , , , , ,

4 Comments:

Anonymous Tom Harte said...

Thanks for the kind words. If anyone would like to contact me further or has any queries, feel free to contact on tom.harte@imcreative.co.uk. We have online demos available if your curiosity takes you further. Many Thanks, Tom

October 1, 2007 11:59 AM  
Blogger Clive Shepherd said...

Teachers in the UK would argue that the education system is now dominated by league tables which don't in their mind fairly measure the true merit of schools and the efforts made by teachers. I'm definitely with you on the power of incentives, just mindful of how difficult it is to find the right measures on which to base these.

October 16, 2007 9:42 AM  
Blogger tom.harte said...

Clive, your right the key is to find the right thing to measure and the beauty with the solutions I provide is that we can pretty much measure anything and display it visually, once you have found the key measurement, things really start to get exciting...

October 17, 2007 2:13 PM  
Blogger Michelle Gallen said...

I agree that the education system is overloaded with league tables that don't measure what pupils, teachers or parents want. And nothing's being changed or evolved...

I guess the thing about the business world is that they work hard to find out what will make their workers work harder and make more money...so they're incentivised...but the idea behind education is still that 'aren't kids lucky they're not down the mines at 10' when our society has evolved way beyond that...and incentivising pupils only pays off financially years and years later. And teachers don't get bonuses for producing learners who are valuable to the nation's economy.

Oh dear. I feel another post coming on...

November 12, 2007 3:31 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home